The Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ): development and validation of an effective patient-reported tool for outcome measurement and patient safety in shoulder surgery

18Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Outcome measurement in shoulder surgery is essential to evaluate the patient safety and treatment efficiency. Currently this is jeopardized by the fact that most patient-reported self-assessment instruments are not comparable. Hence, the aim was to develop a reliable self-assessment questionnaire which allows an easy follow-up of patients. The questionnaire also allows the calculation of 3 well established scoring systems, i.e. the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score. The subjective and objective items of these three systems were condensed into a single 30-questions form and validated against the original questionnaires.Methods: A representative collective of patients of our shoulder clinic was asked to fill in the newly designed self-assessment Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ). At the same time, the established questionnaires for self-assessment of CONSTANT, SPADI and DASH scores were handed out. The obtained results were compared by linear regression analysis.Results: Fifty one patients completed all questionnaires. The correlation coefficients of the results were r = 0.91 for the SPADI, r = -0.93 for the DASH and r = 0.94 for the CMS scoring system, respectively.Conclusions: We developed an instrument which allows a quantitative self-assessment of shoulder function. It provides compatible data sets for the three most popular shoulder function scoring systems by one single, short 30-item. This instrument can be used by shoulder surgeons to effectively monitor the outcome, safety and quality of their treatment and also compare the results to published data in the literature. © 2012 Schmidutz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires

7860Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function

1408Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials

1326Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Clinical and radiological outcome following treatment of displaced lateral clavicle fractures using a locking compression plate with lateral extension: A prospective study

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Memorandum III, Part 3: Quality of care and patient safety research methods

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Assessing Disability Following Upper Extremity Trauma

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schmidutz, F., Beirer, M., Braunstein, V., Bogner, V., Wiedemann, E., & Biberthaler, P. (2012). The Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ): development and validation of an effective patient-reported tool for outcome measurement and patient safety in shoulder surgery. Patient Safety in Surgery, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-6-9

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

79%

Researcher 2

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

71%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

14%

Computer Science 1

7%

Social Sciences 1

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 12

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0