Generalized Bayesian pursuit: A novel scheme for multi-armed Bernoulli bandit problems

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the last decades, a myriad of approaches to the multi-armed bandit problem have appeared in several different fields. The current top performing algorithms from the field of Learning Automata reside in the Pursuit family, while UCB-Tuned and the ε-greedy class of algorithms can be seen as state-of-the-art regret minimizing algorithms. Recently, however, the Bayesian Learning Automaton (BLA) outperformed all of these, and other schemes, in a wide range of experiments. Although seemingly incompatible, in this paper we integrate the foundational learning principles motivating the design of the BLA, with the principles of the so-called Generalized Pursuit algorithm (GPST), leading to the Generalized Bayesian Pursuit algorithm (GBPST). As in the BLA, the estimates are truly Bayesian in nature, however, instead of basing exploration upon direct sampling from the estimates, GBPST explores by means of the arm selection probability vector of GPST. Further, as in the GPST, in the interest of higher rates of learning, a set of arms that are currently perceived as being optimal is pursued to minimize the probability of pursuing a wrong arm. It turns out that GBPST is superior to GPST and that it even performs better than the BLA by controlling the learning speed of GBPST. We thus believe that GBPST constitutes a new avenue of research, in which the performance benefits of the GPST and the BLA are mutually augmented, opening up for improved performance in a number of applications, currently being tested. © 2011 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, X., Oommen, B. J., & Granmo, O. C. (2011). Generalized Bayesian pursuit: A novel scheme for multi-armed Bernoulli bandit problems. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 364 AICT, pp. 122–131). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23960-1_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free