Background: Diagnosis-to-ablation time (DTAT) has been postulated to be one of the predictors of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence, and it is a “modifiable” risk factor unlike that of many electrocardiographic or echocardiographic parameters. This development may change our consideration for ablation. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to analyze the latest evidence on the importance of DTAT and whether they predict the AF recurrence after catheter ablation. Methods: We performed a comprehensive search on topics that assess diagnosis-to-ablation time (DTAT) and AF recurrence from inception up until August 2019 through PubMed, EuropePMC, Cochrane Central Database, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Results: There was a total of 3548 patients from six studies. Longer DTAT was associated with increased risk for AF recurrence in all studies included. Meta-analysis of these studies showed that DTAT had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.19 [1.02, 1.39], P =.03; I2: 92% for AF recurrence. Upon sensitivity analysis by removing a study, HR became 1.24 [1.16, 1.32], P 3 years had HR 1.73 [1.54, 1.93], P 6 years to <1 year, the HR was 1.93 [1.62, 2.29], P
CITATION STYLE
Pranata, R., Chintya, V., Raharjo, S. B., Yamin, M., & Yuniadi, Y. (2020). Longer diagnosis-to-ablation time is associated with recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation—Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Arrhythmia, 36(2), 289–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12294
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.