Longer diagnosis-to-ablation time is associated with recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation—Systematic review and meta-analysis

15Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis-to-ablation time (DTAT) has been postulated to be one of the predictors of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence, and it is a “modifiable” risk factor unlike that of many electrocardiographic or echocardiographic parameters. This development may change our consideration for ablation. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to analyze the latest evidence on the importance of DTAT and whether they predict the AF recurrence after catheter ablation. Methods: We performed a comprehensive search on topics that assess diagnosis-to-ablation time (DTAT) and AF recurrence from inception up until August 2019 through PubMed, EuropePMC, Cochrane Central Database, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Results: There was a total of 3548 patients from six studies. Longer DTAT was associated with increased risk for AF recurrence in all studies included. Meta-analysis of these studies showed that DTAT had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.19 [1.02, 1.39], P =.03; I2: 92% for AF recurrence. Upon sensitivity analysis by removing a study, HR became 1.24 [1.16, 1.32], P 3 years had HR 1.73 [1.54, 1.93], P 6 years to <1 year, the HR was 1.93 [1.62, 2.29], P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pranata, R., Chintya, V., Raharjo, S. B., Yamin, M., & Yuniadi, Y. (2020). Longer diagnosis-to-ablation time is associated with recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation—Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Arrhythmia, 36(2), 289–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12294

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free