Gas turbine heat recovery steam generators for combined cycles natural or forced circulation considerations

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In recent years the combined cycle has become a very attractive power plant arrangement because of its high cycle efficiency, short order-to-on-line time and flexibility in the sizing when compared to conventional steam power plants. However, optimization of the cycle and selection of combined cycle equipment has become more complex because the three major components, Gas Turbine, Heat Recovery Steam Generator and Steam Turbine, are often designed and built by different manufacturers. Heat Recovery Steam Generators are classified into two major categories-1) Natural Circulation and 2) Forced Circulation. Both circulation designs have certain advantages, disadvantages and limitations. This paper analyzes various factors including; availability, start-up, gas turbine exhaust conditions, reliability, space requirements, etc., which are affected by the type of circulation and which in turn affect the design, price and performance of the Heat Recovery Steam Generator. Modern trends around the world are discussed and conclusions are drawn as to the best type of circulation for a Heat Recovery Steam Generator for combined cycle application.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pasha, A. (1988). Gas turbine heat recovery steam generators for combined cycles natural or forced circulation considerations. In Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo (Vol. 4). American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). https://doi.org/10.1115/88-GT-142

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free