Prediction of the burst pressure for defective pipelines using different semi-empirical models

4Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The main aim of this work is to predict the theoretical burst pressure of defective pipelines using different semi-empirical models and compare them with the hydrostatic test results. A new methodology was formulated with accounting for a minimum thickness (weakest section of the pipe) over the length of the pipe to predict the most conservative burst pressure. With a simple analytical expression, a reasonable accuracy and more conservative burst pressure can be obtained for any arbitrary defect shapes. A variation of burst pressure was found between theoretical prediction and hydrostatic burst test results with respect to the different semi-empirical models even for the same corroded defects. Different defect geometry shape and pipe material conditions are the possible causes for variation in the burst pressure between the semi-empirical models, so a careful selection of these parameters is necessary. The proposed methodology predicted a more conservative burst pressure for all arbitrary defects shapes and can predict reasonably accurate values if it accounts for the axial stress.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Budhe, S., Banea, M. D., & de Barros, S. (2020). Prediction of the burst pressure for defective pipelines using different semi-empirical models. Frattura Ed Integrita Strutturale, 14(52), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.52.12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free