Maximizing utility of neuropsychological measures in sex-specific predictive models of incident Alzheimer's disease in the Framingham Heart Study

0Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Sex differences in neuropsychological (NP) test performance might have important implications for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study investigates sex differences in neuropsychological performance among individuals without dementia at baseline. METHODS: Neuropsychological assessment data, both standard test scores and process coded responses, from Framingham Heart Study participants were analyzed for sex differences using regression model and Cox proportional hazards model. Optimal NP profiles were identified by machine learning methods for men and women. RESULTS: Sex differences were observed in both summary scores and composite process scores of NP tests in terms of adjusted means and their associations with AD incidence. The optimal NP profiles for men and women have 10 and 8 measures, respectively, and achieve 0.76 mean area under the curve for AD prediction. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that NP tests can be leveraged for developing more sensitive, sex-specific indices for the diagnosis of AD.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferretti, M. T., Ding, H., Au, R., Liu, C., Devine, S., Auerbach, S., … Ang, T. F. A. (2024). Maximizing utility of neuropsychological measures in sex-specific predictive models of incident Alzheimer’s disease in the Framingham Heart Study. Alzheimer’s and Dementia, 20(2), 1112–1122. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.13500

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free