Moneyness, Underlying Asset Volatility, and the Cross-Section of Option Returns

1Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We study the effect of an asset's volatility on the expected returns of European options on the asset. Deriving predictions from a stochastic discount factor model, we show that the effect depends on whether variations in the asset's volatility are driven by systematic or idiosyncratic volatility. While idiosyncratic-volatility-induced variations only affect the option elasticity, systematic-volatility-induced variations also oppositely affect the expected return of the asset. Since the expected asset return (elasticity) effect dominates for options with more linear (non-linear) payoffs, systematic volatility prices sufficiently in-the-money (out-of-the-money) options with the opposite (same) sign as idiosyncratic volatility. Using single-stock calls as test assets, double-sorted portfolios and Fama-MacBeth (1973) regressions broadly support the model's predictions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aretz, K., Lin, M. T., & Poon, S. H. (2023). Moneyness, Underlying Asset Volatility, and the Cross-Section of Option Returns. Review of Finance, 27(1), 289–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free