The effectiveness of ultrabrief and brief educational videos for training lay responders in hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation implications for the future of citizen cardiopulmonary resuscitation training

82Citations
Citations of this article
137Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background-Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) but often is not performed. We hypothesized that subjects viewing very short Hands-Only CPR videos will (1) be more likely to attempt CPR in a simulated OHCA scenario and (2) demonstrate better CPR skills than untrained individuals. Methods and Results-This study is a prospective trial of 336 adults without recent CPR training randomized into 4 groups: (1) control (no training) (n=51); (2) 60-second video training (n=95); (3) 5-minute video training (n=99); and (4) 8-minute video training, including manikin practice (n=91). All subjects were tested for their ability to perform CPR during an adult OHCA scenario using a CPR-sensing manikin and Laerdal PC SkillReporting software. One half of the trained subjects were randomly assigned to testing immediately and the other half after a 2-month delay. Twelve (23.5%) controls did not even attempt CPR, which was true of only 2 subjects (0.7%; P=0.01) from any of the experimental groups. All experimental groups had significantly higher average compression rates (closer to the recommended 100/min) than the control group (P<0.001), and all experimental groups had significantly greater average compression depth (>38 mm) than the control group (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bobrow, B. J., Vadeboncoeur, T. F., Spaite, D. W., Potts, J., Denninghoff, K., Chikani, V., … Abella, B. S. (2011). The effectiveness of ultrabrief and brief educational videos for training lay responders in hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation implications for the future of citizen cardiopulmonary resuscitation training. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 4(2), 220–226. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.959353

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free