Relative Effectiveness of Bilateral and Multilateral Aid on Development Outcomes

19Citations
Citations of this article
96Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aid donors are interested in understanding whether allocating aid via bilateral or multilateral channels might be more effective for achieving development goals. We review 45 papers that empirically test the associations between bilateral and multilateral aid flows and various development outcomes including gross domestic product growth, governance indicators, human development indicators and levels of non-aid investment flows. Findings suggest that differences between countries and regions, time periods, aid objectives, and individual donor organizations all may influence the effectiveness of aid delivered bilaterally and multilaterally. We find, however, no consistent evidence that either bilateral or multilateral aid is more effective overall.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Biscaye, P. E., Reynolds, T. W., & Anderson, C. L. (2017). Relative Effectiveness of Bilateral and Multilateral Aid on Development Outcomes. Review of Development Economics, 21(4), 1425–1447. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12303

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free