A systematic review and meta-analysis of strength training in individuals with multiple sclerosis or parkinson disease

96Citations
Citations of this article
674Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Strength training has, in recent years, been shown to be beneficial for people with Parkinson disease and multiple sclerosis. Consensus regarding its utility for these disorders nevertheless remains contentious among healthcare professionals. Greater clarity is required, especially in regards to the type and magnitude of effects as well as the response differences to strength training between individuals with Parkinson disease or multiple sclerosis. This study examines the effects, magnitude of those effects, and response differences to strength training between patients with Parkinson disease or multiple sclerosis. A comprehensive search of electronic databases including Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL was conducted from inception to July 2014. English articles investigating the effect of strength training for individuals with neurodegenerative disorders were selected. Strength training trials that met the inclusion criteria were found for individuals with Parkinson disease or multiple sclerosis. Individuals with Parkinson diseaseormultiple sclerosis were included in the study. Strength training interventions included traditional (free weights/machine exercises) and nontraditional programs (eccentric cycling). Included articles were critically appraised using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. Of the 507 articles retrieved, only 20 articles met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 14 were randomized and 6 were nonrandomized controlled articles in Parkinson disease or multiple sclerosis. Six randomized and 2 nonrandomized controlled articles originated from 3 trials and were subsequently pooled for systematic analysis. Strength training was found to significantly improve muscle strength in people with Parkinson disease (15%-83.2%) and multiple sclerosis (4.5%-36%). Significant improvements in mobility (11.4%) and disease progression were also reported in people with Parkinson disease after strength training. Furthermore, significant improvements in fatigue (8.2%), functional capacity (21.5%), quality of life (8.3%), power (17.6%), and electro-myography activity (24.4%) were found in individuals with multiple sclerosis after strength training. The limitations of the study were the heterogeneity of interventions and study outcomes in Parkinson disease and multiple sclerosis trials. Strength training is useful for increasing muscle strength in Parkinson disease and to a lesser extent multiple sclerosis.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

9371Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases

5345Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials

3659Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis: An overview of Cochrane systematic reviews

185Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews

150Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exercise mimetics: harnessing the therapeutic effects of physical activity

82Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cruickshank, T. M., Reyes, A. R., & Ziman, M. R. (2015). A systematic review and meta-analysis of strength training in individuals with multiple sclerosis or parkinson disease. Medicine (United States), 94(4). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000411

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 211

72%

Researcher 46

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 26

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 12

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 123

34%

Medicine and Dentistry 117

33%

Sports and Recreations 83

23%

Neuroscience 36

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 13

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free