Differences in the dose accuracy of insulin pens

43Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Modern insulin injection pens provide a convenient and accurate way for diabetes patients to inject insulin. They have widespread use among children and adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the U.S. and Europe. This study compared the dosing accuracy of four commonly available insulin pens (OptiClik® and SoloSTAR® from sanofi-aventis, FlexPen® from Novo Nordisk, and HumaPen® LUXURA" from Eli Lilly). Methods: The dosing accuracy was tested for all pens with 24 × 10 IU and 9 × 30 IU injection volumes to investigate whether the pens complied with the acceptable International Organization for Standardization (ISO) limits of 10% (± 1 IU) for 10 IU and 5% (± 1.5 IU) for 30 IU. The doses were each applied with a new needle strictly according to the instructions for use by the pen manufacturers. A pharmaceutical balance was used for the assessment of the applied volumes, and the results were corrected for the specific density of the insulin formulations. Four in}sulin pens (two each from different production lots) were used for each of the two volumes, resulting in a total of 192 doses per pen with 10 IU, and 72 doses per pen with 30 IU. Results: FlexPen (mean absolute percent deviation for 10 IU and 30 IU: 1.64 ± 0.84% and 0.83 ± 0.26%, respectively) and HumaPen LUXURA (1.10 ± 0.20% and 0.62 ± 0.19%; not significant versus FlexPen for both doses) were more accurate than the OptiClik (4.78 ± 3.31% and 2.97 ± 2.48%, p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hänel, H., Weise, A., Sun, W., Pfützner, J. W., Thomé, N., & Pfützner, A. (2008). Differences in the dose accuracy of insulin pens. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2(3), 478–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/193229680800200318

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free