Rubber's inclusion in zero-deforestation legislation is necessary but not sufficient to reduce impacts on biodiversity

4Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Agricultural commodity production is a major driver of tropical deforestation and biodiversity loss. Natural rubber from Hevea brasiliensis, a valuable commodity without viable substitutes, has recently been included in the European Union (EU) deforestation regulation that aims to halt imports of goods containing embedded deforestation. Sustained growth in demand for rubber is driven by increasing tire production, caused by rising transport flows and personal car ownership. We show that average natural rubber yields remain static, meaning 2.7–5.3 million ha of additional plantations could be needed by 2030 to meet demand. A systematic literature search identified 106 case studies concerning transitions to and from rubber, revealing that substantial rubber plantation area expansion since 2010 has occurred at the expense of natural forest. Eliminating deforestation from rubber supply chains requires support for millions of smallholder growers to maintain or increase production from existing plantations, without land or water degradation. Supply chain traceability efforts offer opportunities to deliver such support. While the inclusion of rubber in EU legislation is a positive step, it is critical to ensure that smallholders are not marginalized to avoid exacerbating poverty, and that other markets follow suit to avoid displacement of rubber-driven deforestation to unregulated markets.

References Powered by Scopus

Current trends of rubber plantation expansion may threaten biodiversity and livelihoods

320Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Disentangling the numbers behind agriculture-driven tropical deforestation

208Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Land-use choices follow profitability at the expense of ecological functions in Indonesian smallholder landscapes

204Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

High-resolution maps show that rubber causes substantial deforestation

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The impacts of crop diversity adoption on Rubber Farmers’ Welfare: evidence from Thailand

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Accounting for trade in derived products when estimating European Union's role in driving deforestation

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Warren-Thomas, E., Ahrends, A., Wang, Y., Wang, M. M. H., & Jones, J. P. G. (2023). Rubber’s inclusion in zero-deforestation legislation is necessary but not sufficient to reduce impacts on biodiversity. Conservation Letters, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12967

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

54%

Researcher 4

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

33%

Business, Management and Accounting 4

33%

Environmental Science 2

17%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

17%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 2
News Mentions: 12

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0