Constitutional revolutions and the constituent power: A reply to Mark Tushnet

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this short reply to the article by Mark Tushnet, "Peasants with Pitchforks, and Toilers with Twitter: Constitutional Revolutions and the Constituent Power," I seek to explain why I do not find Tushnet's account of constituent power and unconstitutional amendments very helpful in our understanding of both the underlying theoretical controversies and actual constitutional transformations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Komárek, J. (2015). Constitutional revolutions and the constituent power: A reply to Mark Tushnet. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(4), 1054–1058. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov060

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free