In this short reply to the article by Mark Tushnet, "Peasants with Pitchforks, and Toilers with Twitter: Constitutional Revolutions and the Constituent Power," I seek to explain why I do not find Tushnet's account of constituent power and unconstitutional amendments very helpful in our understanding of both the underlying theoretical controversies and actual constitutional transformations.
CITATION STYLE
Komárek, J. (2015). Constitutional revolutions and the constituent power: A reply to Mark Tushnet. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(4), 1054–1058. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov060
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.