Compression Therapy: Clinical and Experimental Evidence

  • Partsch H
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

AIM A review is given on the different tools of compression therapy and their mode of action. METHODS Interface pressure and stiffness of compression devices, alone or in combination can be measured in vivo. Hemodynamic effects have been demonstrated by measuring venous volume and flow velocity using MRI, Duplex and radioisotopes, venous reflux and venous pumping function using plethysmography and phlebodynamometry. Oedema reduction can be measured by limb volumetry. RESULTS Compression stockings exerting a pressure of ~20 mmHg on the distal leg are able to increase venous blood flow velocity in the supine position and to prevent leg swelling after prolonged sitting and standing. In the upright position, an interface pressure of more than 50 mmHg is needed for intermittent occlusion of incompetent veins and for a reduction of ambulatory venous hypertension during walking. Such high intermittent interface pressure peaks exerting a "massaging effect" may rather be achieved by short stretch multilayer bandages than by elastic stockings. CONCLUSION Compression is a cornerstone in the management of venous and lymphatic insufficiency. However, this treatment modality is still underestimated and deserves better understanding and improved educational programs, both for patients and medical staff.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Partsch, H. (2012). Compression Therapy: Clinical and Experimental Evidence. Annals of Vascular Diseases, 5(4), 416–422. https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.ra.12.00068

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free