Phakic IOLs: Sulcus Versus Iris-Claw Versus Angle-Supported: Complications and Outcomes

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Patient interest in refractive eye surgery is increasing, especially for correction of high levels of myopia and hyperopia. Outcomes of techniques that work well for correcting lower levels of error, such as excimer laser correction, fall short of patient expectations. These expectations have driven the development of new technology for correcting high refractive errors. A new technique, phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) insertion has proven to be safe and effective for treating high myopia and high hyperopia. In this article, the different types of pIOLs are discussed along with recently published results and complications of each design. Larger studies with long term follow up are needed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Raciti, M. W., & Majmudar, P. A. (2013). Phakic IOLs: Sulcus Versus Iris-Claw Versus Angle-Supported: Complications and Outcomes. Current Ophthalmology Reports, 1(1), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40135-012-0001-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free