Aim: To compare the effects of the liquid-isolating maneuver and the lever-elevating maneuver in protecting cervical structures during microwave ablation for treating high-risk benign thyroid nodules. Methods: This prospectively study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Panzhihua Central Hospital. A total of 174 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to a liquid-isolating maneuver group (LIM, n = 87) or a lever-elevating maneuver group (LEM, n = 87). Operation time, postoperative voice change, time to recovery of baseline voice, peri-thyroid hematoma, neck tension, and intraoperative vasovagal reaction were assessed. Results: Operation time was greater in the LIM group than in the LEM group (44.75 ± 13.14 vs. 32.87 ± 10.84 min; p =.017).Voice changes were observed in 6 patients in the LIM group and 2 in the LEM group (6.9% vs. 2.3%, p =.278). The time to recovery of baseline voice was significantly greater in the LIM group compared with the LEM group (36.15 ± 10.24 vs. 24.48 ± 11.53 days, p =.014). The incidences of peri-thyroid hematoma and neck tension were higher in the LIM than in the LEM group (11.5% vs. 3.4%, 10.3% vs. 2.3%, p =.044 and p =.029). One patient (1.1%) in the LEM group and none of the patients in the LIM group experienced a vasovagal response (p = 1.000). Conclusion: The lever-elevating method is feasible and effective for the microwave ablation of benign thyroid nodules, with better protection of neck structures than observed with the liquid-isolating method.
CITATION STYLE
Yang, H., Wu, Y., Luo, J., Yang, X., & Yan, J. (2019). Lever-elevating vs. liquid-isolating maneuvers during microwave ablation of high-risk benign thyroid nodules: a prospective single-center study. International Journal of Hyperthermia, 36(1), 1239–1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2019.1690711
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.