Do a threatened native amphibian and its invasive congener differ in response to human alteration of the landscape?

27Citations
Citations of this article
137Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Anthropogenic changes to habitat are a global phenomenon and the impact of these changes may act in tandem to cause loss of biodiversity. One major global change is the introduction of invasive species. In order to determine whether other human impacts might correlate with populations of invaders, we examined the habitat correlates of distribution, persistence and reproduction of a global invader, the American bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). We then compared these correlates with those of a threatened, native congener, the California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii). We found striking differences between the two species in response to habitat fragmentation and degradation. Our work suggests that human alteration of habitat, in particular the hydrology of freshwater sites and through building roads, favors this invasive species across the landscape. © The Author(s) 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

D’Amore, A., Hemingway, V., & Wasson, K. (2010). Do a threatened native amphibian and its invasive congener differ in response to human alteration of the landscape? Biological Invasions, 12(1), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9438-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free