Agroecology: Polysemy, pluralism and controversies

17Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In recent years, a growing number of actors and institutions, in different countries, have begun using the notion of Agroecology, which has led to an expansion of its polysemy and its controversies. Taking this into account, this paper analyzes, based on the Brazilian and French experiences, the peculiarities of Agroecology in four different fields: science, social movements, government policies, and education. It also discusses three other issues: the analytical, programmatic and normative discourses; the different definitions, in the fields of science and education, of the object of study of Agroecology; and the different formulations regarding its fundamental principles. It is argued that, in this new context, recognition of this pluralism and the controversies acquires a central role in the construction of knowledge in the various fields linked to Agroecology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Norder, L. A., Lamine, C., Bellon, S., & Brandenburg, A. (2016). Agroecology: Polysemy, pluralism and controversies. Ambiente e Sociedade, 19(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422ASOC129711V1932016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free