Maximum standardized uptake value on 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography improves outcome prediction in retroperitoneal liposarcoma

11Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

While 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET/CT) has been investigated in extremity sarcomas, there is no evidence on its usefulness in retroperitoneal sarcoma. This study was designed to evaluate the usefulness of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in predicting aggressiveness of retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Patients experienced surgery for retroperitoneal liposarcoma from November 2007 to February 2018 and underwent preoperative 18 F-FDG PET/CT were included. Preoperative maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max ) was calculated. To evaluate the predictability of SUV max for Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) grade 3, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed. To analyze whether SUV max can be a risk factor for prognosis, multivariable Cox regression was performed including potential risk factors regarding operation and histopathology. A total of 133 patients were included. ROC curve showed area under the curve of 0.877 (P < 0.001), with a cut-off point of 4.5 SUV max showing 85.7% sensitivity and 78.3% specificity. Cox analyses showed that SUV max > 4.5 was a significant factor for recurrence-free survival (HR = 2.148, CI 1.301–3.546, P = 0.003) and overall survival (HR = 5.052, CI 1.854–13.766, P = 0.002). SUV max is highly predictive of FNCLCC grade 3 and SUV max > 4.5 can be used as a prognostic factor before obtaining the histopathology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rhu, J., Hyun, S. H., Lee, K. H., Jo, S. J., Lee, K. W., Park, J. B., & Kim, S. J. (2019). Maximum standardized uptake value on 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography improves outcome prediction in retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Scientific Reports, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43215-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free