A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives

14Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

After tooth extraction, dimensional changes affect the alveolar socket, leading to loss in alveolar bone height and width. Histological modifications also occur, with initial formation of a blood clot that is replaced with granulation tissue and subsequently with a provisional connective tissue matrix. Spontaneous healing ends with socket filling with woven bone, which is gradually replaced with lamellar bone and bone marrow. Adequate alveolar ridge dimensions and bone quality are required to assure optimal stability and osseointegration following dental implant placement. When a tooth is extracted, alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures are an effective method to prevent collapse of the post-extraction socket. Heterologous bone is widely chosen by clinicians for ARP, and anorganic bone xenografts (ABXs) made bioinert by heat treatment represents the most used biomaterial in clinical applications. Collagen-preserving bone xenografts (CBXs) made of porcine or equine bone are fabricated by less invasive chemical or enzymatic treatments to remove xenogenic antigens, and these are also effective in preserving post-extraction sites. Clinical differences between anorganic bone substitutes and collagen-preserving materials are not well documented in the literature but understanding these differences could clarify how processing protocols influence biomaterial behavior in situ. This systematic review of the literature compares the dimensional changes and histological features of ABXs versus CBXs in ridge preservation procedures to promote awareness of different bone xenograft efficacies in stimulating the healing of post-extraction sockets.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53668Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

46981Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog

1514Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Alveolar ridge preservation: Complications and cost-effectiveness

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Customized three-dimensional printed ceramic bone grafts for osseous defects: a prospective randomized study

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Advancements in alveolar bone grafting and ridge preservation: a narrative review on materials, techniques, and clinical outcomes

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Di Stefano, D. A., Orlando, F., Ottobelli, M., Fiori, D., & Garagiola, U. (2022, December 1). A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00349-3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

73%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

13%

Researcher 2

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

63%

Engineering 4

25%

Chemical Engineering 1

6%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free