Vulnerability and resilience to food and nutrition insecurity: A review of the literature towards a unified framework

1Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Current approaches to measuring food and nutrition security (FNS) mainly consider past access to food, while assessing vulnerability and resilience to food insecurity requires a dynamic setting and sound predictive models, conditional to the entire set of food-related multiple-scale shocks and stresses as well as households’ char-acteristics. The aim of this work is twofold: i) to review the state of the relevant literature on the conceptualization and the empirical measurement of vulnerability and resilience to food insecurity; ii) to frame the main coordinates of a possible unifying framework aiming at improving ex-ante targeting of policy interventions and resil-ience-enhancing programs. Our argument is that clarifying the relationships existing between vulnerability and resilience provides a better understanding and a more comprehensive picture of food insecurity that includes higher-order conditional moments and non-linearities. Furthermore, adopting the proposed unified framework, one can derive FNS measures that are: scalable and aggregable into higher-level dimensions (scale axiom); inherently dynamic (time axiom); conditioned to various factors (access axiom); applicable to various measures of food and nutrition as dependent variables (outcomes axiom). Unfortunately, the proposed unified framework shows some limita-tions. First, estimating conditional moments is highly data-demanding, requiring high-quality and high-frequency micro-level panel data for all the relevant FNS dimensions, not mentioning the difficulty of measuring risks/shocks and their associated prob-abilities using short panel data. Hence, there is a general issue of applicability of the proposed approach to typically data-scarce environments such as developing contexts. Second, there is an inherent tradeoff between the proposed approach in-sample preci-sion and out-of-sample predictive performance. This is key to implement effective early warning systems and foster resilience-building programs.

References Powered by Scopus

Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems

5024Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Increasing risk: I. A definition

2200Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The complexity and stability of ecosystems

2165Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Food security in Ukraine today’s conditions

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Montalbano, P., & Romano, D. (2022). Vulnerability and resilience to food and nutrition insecurity: A review of the literature towards a unified framework. Bio-Based and Applied Economics, 11(4), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-14125

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

45%

Researcher 3

27%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

30%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3

30%

Engineering 3

30%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free