Lecture XII

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We come back to the question why the logical method of rigorous logical inferences that works so well in geometry cannot be used in philosophy. Philosophical concepts are already in place before we begin philosophising, so that any attempt at defining them ends up in concept-swapping, i.e. replacing the original concept with a different and arbitrary one. Whenever philosophers do that, they equivocate. This fallacy is often compounded with circular definitions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nelson, L. (2016). Lecture XII. In Argumentation Library (Vol. 26, pp. 109–116). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20783-4_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free