Aortogenic embolism and paradoxical embolism due to patent foramen ovale and deep vein thrombosis

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aortogenic and paradoxical embolisms have been recognized as possible causes of cryptogenic stroke. For the diagnosis of both conditions, transesophageal echocardiography has been widely used in the routine examination of ischemic stroke patients. An aortic IMT>4 mm, mobile plaques and ulcers were defined as complex lesions and could be a potential risk for ischemic stroke. For medical treatment of aortogenic embolism, combination of statin and anti-thrombotic therapy (either antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy) is recommended. For diagnosis of paradoxical embolism, confirmation of a right-to-left shunt through the patent foramen ovale is not sufficient enough because almost 20% of healthy adults have a right-to-left shunt. A diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism is also required. For cryptogenic stroke patients with patent foramen ovale, antiplatelet therapy is usually recommended to prevent a recurrent event while warfarin is reasonable for high-risk patients who have other indications for anticoagulation such as venous thrombosis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kitagawa, K. (2008). Aortogenic embolism and paradoxical embolism due to patent foramen ovale and deep vein thrombosis. Japanese Journal of Neurosurgery, 17(12), 901–908. https://doi.org/10.7887/jcns.17.901

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free