This paper compares two understandings of “learning” in the context of AGI research: algorithmic learning that approximates an input/output function according to given instances, and inferential learning that organizes various aspects of the system according to experience. The former is how “learning” is often interpreted in the machine learning community, while the latter is exemplified by the AGI system NARS. This paper describes the learning mechanism of NARS, and contrasts it with canonical machine learning algorithms. It is concluded that inferential learning is arguably more fundamental for AGI systems.
CITATION STYLE
Wang, P., & Li, X. (2016). Different conceptions of learning: Function approximation vs. self-organization. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9782, pp. 140–149). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41649-6_14
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.