Comparing patent and scientific literature in airborne wind energy

24Citations
Citations of this article
98Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Airborne Wind Energy (AWE) is a renewable energy technology that uses wind power devices rather than traditional wind turbines that take advantage of the kinetic wind energy, and remain in the air due to aerodynamic forces. This article aims to compare the scientific literature with the patents on wind power with tethered airfoils, to obtain better insights into the literature of this area of knowledge. The method used in this study was a comparative bibliometric analysis, using theWeb of Science and Derwent Innovations Index databases, and the Network Analysis Interface for Literature Review software and VosViewer. It was possible to verify the main authors, research centers and companies, countries and journals that publish on the subject; the most cited documents; the technological classes; and the networks of collaborations of this work. It was also possible to identify that researches on wind energy with tethered airfoils began their studies in the late 1970s with the first patent apparently dated from 1975 by the inventors Dai and Dai. The first scientific publication was in 1979 by authors Fletcher and Roberts, followed by Loyd in 1980. United States is the country that presented the highest number of patents and scientific papers. Both scientific papers and patents set up networks of collaboration; that is, important authors are interacting with others to establish cooperative partnerships.

References Powered by Scopus

Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping

12603Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CROSSWIND KITE POWER.

466Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The value of U.S. patents by owner and patent characteristics

364Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Sustainable water use in agriculture: A review of worldwide research

140Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A bibliometric analysis of international competitiveness (1983-2017)

63Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The persistence of high energy burden: Results of a bibliometric analysis

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Souza Mendonça, A. K., Vaz, C. R., Lezana, álvaro G. R., Anacleto, C. A., & Paladini, E. P. (2017). Comparing patent and scientific literature in airborne wind energy. Sustainability (Switzerland). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060915

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 31

60%

Researcher 10

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 30

64%

Business, Management and Accounting 7

15%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6

13%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
References: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 4

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free