Sameness and the self: Philosophical and psychological considerations

41Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper I examine the concept of cross-temporal personal identity (diachronicity). This particular form of identity has vexed theorists for centuries-e.g., how can a person maintain a belief in the sameness of self over time in the face of continual psychological and physical change? I first discuss various forms of the sameness relation and the criteria that justify their application. I then examine philosophical and psychological treatments of personal diachronicity (for example, Locke's psychological connectedness theory; the role of episodic memory) and find each lacking on logical grounds, empirical grounds or both. I conclude that to achieve a successful resolution of the issue of the self as a temporal continuant we need to draw a sharp distinction between the feeling of the sameness of one's self and the evidence marshaled in support of that feeling. © 2014 Klein.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Klein, S. B. (2014). Sameness and the self: Philosophical and psychological considerations. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(JAN). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00029

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free