Deletion of uncharacterized domain from α-1,3-glucanase of bacillus circulans KA-304 enhances heterologous enzyme production in escherichia coli

6Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

α-1,3-Glucanase (Agl-KA) of Bacillus circulans KA-304 consists of an N-terminal discoidin domain (DS1), a carbohydrate binding module family 6 (CBM6), threonine and proline repeats (TP), a second discoidin domain (DS2), an uncharacterized conserved domain (UCD), and a C-terminal catalytic domain. Previously, we reported that DS1, CBM6, and DS2 have α-1,3-glucan-binding activity and contribute to α-1,3-glucan hydrolysis. In this study, UCD deletion mutant (Agl∆UCD) was constructed, and its properties were compared with those of Agl-KA. α-1,3-Glucan hydrolyzing, α-1,3-glucan binding, and protoplast-forming activities of Agl∆UCD were almost the same as those of Agl-KA. kcat/Km values of Agl∆UCD and Agl-KA were 11.4 and 11.1 s–1 mg–1 mL, respectively. Agl∆UCD and Agl-KA exhibited similar characteristics, such as optimal pH, pH stability, optimal temperature, and thermostability. These results suggest that UCD is not α-1,3-glucan-binding and flexible linker domain, and that deletion of UCD does not affect the affinity of N-terminal binding domains and the catalytic action of the C-terminal domain. Subsequently, heterologous enzyme productivity of Agl∆UCD in Escherichia coli was compared with that of Agl-KA. The productivity of Agl∆UCD was about 4-fold larger than that of Agl-KA after an 8-h induction at 30∞C. In the case of induction at 20∞C, the productivity of Agl∆UCD was also larger than that of Agl-KA. These findings indicate that deletion of only UCD enhances the enzyme productivity in E. coli.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yano, S., Suyotha, W., Zanma, S., Konno, H., Cherdvorapong, V., & Wakayama, M. (2018). Deletion of uncharacterized domain from α-1,3-glucanase of bacillus circulans KA-304 enhances heterologous enzyme production in escherichia coli. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, 64(5), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.2017.12.005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free