Percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with formerly ''refractory angina pectoris in end-stage coronary artery disease'' - Not ''end-stage'' after all

12Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Patients with refractory angina pectoris in end-stage coronary artery disease represent a severe condition with a higher reduction of life-expectancy and quality of life as compared to patients with stable coronary artery disease. It was the purpose of this study to invasively re-evaluate highly symptomatic patients with formerly diagnosed refractory angina pectoris in end-stage coronary artery disease for feasible options of myocardial revascularization. Methods: Thirty-four Patients formerly characterized as having end stage coronary artery disease with refractory angina pectoris were retrospectively followed for coronary interventions. Results: Of those 34 patients 21 (61.8%) were eventually revascularized with percutaneous interventional revascularization (PCI). Due to complex coronary morphology (angulation, chronic total occlusion) PCI demanded an above-average amount of time (66 ± 42 minutes, range 25-206 minutes) and materials (contrast media 247 ± 209 ml, range 50-750 ml; PCI guiding wires 2.0 ± 1.4, range 1-6 wires). Of PCI patients 7 (33.3%) showed a new lesion as a sign of progression of atherosclerosis. Clinical success rate with a reduction to angina class II or lower was 71.4% at 30 days. Surgery was performed in a total of8 (23.5%) patients with a clinical success rate of 62.5%. Based on an intention-to-treat 2 patients of originally 8 (25%) demonstrated clinical success. Mortality during follow-up (1-18 months) was 4.8% in patients who underwent PCI, 25% in patients treated surgically and 25% in those only treated medically. Conclusion: The majority of patients with end-stage coronary artery disease can be treated effectively with conventional invasive treatment modalities. Therefore even though it is challenging and demanding PCI should be considered as a first choice before experimental interventions are considered. © 2009 Jax et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jax, T. W., Peters, A. J., Khattab, A. A., Heintzen, M. P., & Schoebel, F. C. (2009). Percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with formerly “‘refractory angina pectoris in end-stage coronary artery disease’” - Not “ ‘end-stage’” after all. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 9, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-9-42

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free