Situational Dimension

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As a result of the many corporate scandals that have taken place around the world, best‐practice corporate governance guidelines have been developed in most countries. Internationally, the biggest influence on these guidelines has come from the Institute of Directors (IoD) in London, through the advice they provide to other nations. Many countries that do not actually contract with the IoD for advice, nonetheless incorporate aspects of the IoD thinking in their best‐practice guidelines. This is a positive development, although the following issues should be noted: 1.The Anglo‐American model of governance is being promoted as the global standard2.Soft law does not necessarily address the soft dimension of a firm (in other words, laying down a new soft law does not replace the need for integrity in board relationships and processes) and3.Best‐practice guidelines are typically designed for large, publicly listed firms In adopting corporate governance guidelines developed elsewhere, companies should be aware of the fact that there is not a ″one size fits all″ approach in corporate governance. Hence we base our approach on the principle “Keep it situational.” Besides the board members themselves, the fit between the external and internal contexts is the most important determinant of a firm’s success (see Fig. 2.1). In this chapter we review the external and internal context factors that have a lasting impact on firm success.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hilb, M. (2016). Situational Dimension. In Management for Professionals (Vol. Part F480, pp. 9–51). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49060-0_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free