Analysis of evolution mechanism and optimal reward-penalty mechanism for collection strategies in reverse supply chains: The case ofwaste mobile phones in China

14Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to discuss the coopetition (cooperative competition) relationship between a manufacturer and a collector in the collection of waste mobile phones (WMPs) and examine the evolution mechanism and the internal reward-penalty mechanism (RPM) for their collection strategies. A coopetition evolutionary game model based on evolutionary game theory was developed to obtain their common and evolutional collection strategies. The pure-strategy Nash equilibriums of this model were obtained which showed their collection strategy choices of perfect competition or cooperation. The mixed strategy Nash equilibrium was obtained which revealed evolution trends and laws. In addition, the optimal RPM was obtained in the sensitivity analysis of related parameters. The example of WMPs in China was taken to examine the simulation of the RPM. Results show that (i) although the manufacturer and the collector may change their strategies of cooperation and competition over time, cooperation is their best choice to increase payoffs; (ii) the optimal RPM is beneficial to propel their cooperation tendency and then to increase their payoffs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ding, Y., Ma, L., Zhang, Y., & Feng, D. (2018). Analysis of evolution mechanism and optimal reward-penalty mechanism for collection strategies in reverse supply chains: The case ofwaste mobile phones in China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124744

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free