Vasopressor-sparing strategies in patients with shock: A scoping-review and an evidence-based strategy proposition

25Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite the abundant literature on vasopressor therapy, few studies have focused on vasopressor-sparing strategies in patients with shock. We performed a scoping-review of the published studies evaluating vasopressor-sparing strategies by analyzing the results from randomized controlled trials conducted in patients with shock, with a focus on vasopressor doses and/or duration reduction. We analyzed 143 studies, mainly performed in septic shock. Our analysis demonstrated that several pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies are associated with a decrease in the duration of vasopressor therapy. These strategies are as follows: implementing a weaning strategy, vasopressin use, systemic glucocorticoid administration, beta-blockers, and normothermia. On the contrary, early goal directed therapies, including fluid therapy, oral vasopressors, vitamin C, and renal replacement therapy, are not associated with an increase in vasopressor-free days. Based on these results, we proposed an evidence-based vasopressor management strategy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guinot, P. G., Martin, A., Berthoud, V., Voizeux, P., Bartamian, L., Santangelo, E., … Nguyen, M. (2021, July 2). Vasopressor-sparing strategies in patients with shock: A scoping-review and an evidence-based strategy proposition. Journal of Clinical Medicine. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143164

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free