The capacity for self-control is critical to adaptive functioning, yet our knowledge of the underlying processes and mechanisms is presently only inchoate. Theoretical work in economics has suggested a model of self-control centering on two key assumptions: (1) a division within the decision-maker between two 'selves' with differing preferences; (2) the idea that self-control is intrinsically costly. Neuroscience has recently generated findings supporting the 'dual-self' assumption. The idea of self-control costs, in contrast, has remained speculative. We report the first independent evidence for self-control costs. Through a neuroimaging meta-analysis, we establish an anatomical link between self-control and the registration of cognitive effort costs. This link predicts that individuals who strongly avoid cognitive demand should also display poor self-control. To test this, we conducted a behavioral experiment leveraging a measure of demand avoidance along with two measures of self-control. The results obtained provide clear support for the idea of self-control costs. © 2013 Kool et al.
CITATION STYLE
Kool, W., McGuire, J. T., Wang, G. J., & Botvinick, M. M. (2013). Neural and Behavioral Evidence for an Intrinsic Cost of Self-Control. PLoS ONE, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072626
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.