Diagnostic accuracy of stress first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI compared with stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy

94Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion MRI acquired with saturation-recovery prepared turbo fast low-angle shot (turbo FLASH) compared with stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Recent studies show that first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI can provide noninvasive detection of low-limiting stenosis in the coronary artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS. First-pass contrast-enhanced MR images were acquired at rest and during stress in 40 patients with suspected coronary artery disease. All patients underwent thallium-201 SPECT without attenuation correction and coronary angiography. Two reviewers independently assigned one of five confidence grades without knowing the results of coronary angiography for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Luminal stenosis >70% on coronary angiography was used as a reference standard. RESULTS. On coronary angiography, 70% or greater diameter stenosis of the coronary artery was observed in 21 (52.5%) of 40 patients. The areas under the ROC curve for detection of significant stenosis in the individual coronary artery were 0.86 (observer 1) and 0.84 (observer 2) for MRI. These values were 0.79 (observer 1, p = not significant) and 0.72 (observer 2, p = not significant) for 201Tl SPECT. CONCLUSION. The diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion MRI acquired with saturation-recovery-prepared turbo FLASH was comparable with that of stress 201Tl SPECT. Stress first-pass contrast-enhanced MRI is a noninvasive technique that can be used as an alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. © American Roentgen Ray Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sakuma, H., Suzawa, N., Ichikawa, Y., Makino, K., Hirano, T., Kitagawa, K., & Takeda, K. (2005). Diagnostic accuracy of stress first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI compared with stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. American Journal of Roentgenology, 185(1), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.185.1.01850095

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free