Novel image analysis approach quantifies morphological characteristics of 3D breast culture acini with varying metastatic potentials

8Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Prognosis of breast cancer is primarily predicted by the histological grading of the tumor, where pathologists manually evaluate microscopic characteristics of the tissue. This labor intensive process suffers from intra- and inter-observer variations; thus, computer-aided systems that accomplish this assessment automatically are in high demand. We address this by developing an image analysis framework for the automated grading of breast cancer in in vitro three-dimensional breast epithelial acini through the characterization of acinar structure morphology. A set of statistically significant features for the characterization of acini morphology are exploited for the automated grading of six (MCF10 series) cell line cultures mimicking three grades of breast cancer along the metastatic cascade. In addition to capturing both expected and visually differentiable changes, we quantify subtle differences that pose a challenge to assess through microscopic inspection. Our method achieves 89.0% accuracy in grading the acinar structures as nonmalignant, noninvasive carcinoma, and invasive carcinoma grades. We further demonstrate that the proposed methodology can be successfully applied for the grading of in vivo tissue samples albeit with additional constraints. These results indicate that the proposed features can be used to describe the relationship between the acini morphology and cellular function along the metastatic cascade. Copyright © 2012 Lindsey McKeen Polizzotti et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McKeen Polizzotti, L., Oztan, B., Bjornsson, C. S., Shubert, K. R., Yener, B., & Plopper, G. E. (2012). Novel image analysis approach quantifies morphological characteristics of 3D breast culture acini with varying metastatic potentials. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/102036

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free