Generating feedback for English Foreign language exercises

15Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

While immediate feedback on learner language is often discussed in the Second Language Acquisition literature (e.g., Mackey 2006), few systems used in real-life educational settings provide helpful, metalinguistic feedback to learners. In this paper, we present a novel approach leveraging task information to generate the expected range of well-formed and ill-formed variability in learner answers along with the required diagnosis and feedback. We combine this offline generation approach with an online component that matches the actual student answers against the pre-computed hypotheses. The results obtained for a set of 33 thousand answers of 7th grade German high school students learning English show that the approach successfully covers frequent answer patterns. At the same time, paraphrases and meaning errors require a more flexible alignment approach, for which we are planning to complement the method with the CoMiC approach successfully used for the analysis of reading comprehension answers (Meurers et al., 2011).

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text
204Citations
74Readers
Get full text

A trainable spaced repetition model for language learning

148Citations
434Readers

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Text mining in education

157Citations
354Readers
Get full text
21Citations
131Readers

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rudzewitz, B., Ziai, R., de Kuthy, K., Möller, V., Nuxoll, F., & Meurers, D. (2018). Generating feedback for English Foreign language exercises. In Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, BEA 2018 at the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HTL 2018 (pp. 127–136). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w18-0513

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

58%

Researcher 9

24%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 29

63%

Linguistics 9

20%

Social Sciences 5

11%

Engineering 3

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0