Inhospital death is a biased measure of fatal outcome from bloodstream infection

18Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: Inhospital death is commonly used as an outcome measure. However, it may be a biased measure of overall fatal outcome. The objective of this study was to evaluate inhospital death as a measure of all-cause 30-day case fatality in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI). Patients and methods: A population-based surveillance cohort study was conducted, and patients who died in hospital within 30 days (30-day inhospital death) were compared with those who died in any location by day 30 post BSI diagnosis (30-day all-cause case fatality). Results: A total of 1,773 residents had first incident episodes of BSI. Overall, 299 patients died for a 30-day all-cause case fatality rate of 16.9%. Most (1,587; 89.5%) of the patients were admitted to hospital, and ten (5.4%) of the 186 patients not admitted to hospital died. Of the 1,587 admitted patients, 242 died for a 30-day inhospital death rate of 15.2%. A further 47 patients admitted to hospital died after discharge but within 30 days of BSI diagnosis for a 30-day case fatality rate among admitted patients of 18.2%. Patients who died following discharge within 30 days were older and more likely to have dementia. Conclusion: The use of inhospital death is a biased measure of true case fatality.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Laupland, K. B., Pasquill, K., Parfitt, E. C., Dagasso, G., Gupta, K., & Steele, L. (2019). Inhospital death is a biased measure of fatal outcome from bloodstream infection. Clinical Epidemiology, 11, 47–52. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S187381

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free