The Salford Lung Study: a pioneering comparative effectiveness approach to COPD and asthma in clinical trials

  • Albertson T
  • Murin S
  • Sutter M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Salford Lung Study (SLS) of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a practical, community-based, randomized, open-label pragmatic study on the efficacy and safety of the once-daily dry powder inhaler that combines the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone furoate (FF) with the long-acting beta2 agonist vilanterol (VI). The asthma component of the SLS is not yet reported but the COPD component, done over a 12-month period, found a statistically significant 8.4% reduction in COPD exacerbations when compared to usual care. No differences in adverse events, including serious adverse events and pneumonia, were noted. The importance of real-world findings, such as those found in the SLS COPD trial with inhaled FF/VI, is discussed in comparison to classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with inhaled FF/VI in COPD patients. The real-world, community-based pragmatic RCT like the SLS provides additional generalizable data with direct clinical applicability and potential usefulness in the development of practice guidelines. The results from the SLS, along with those of large and small RCTs, are supportive of the use of once-daily FF/VI in COPD maintenance therapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Albertson, T., Murin, S., Sutter, M., & Chenoweth, J. (2017). The Salford Lung Study: a pioneering comparative effectiveness approach to COPD and asthma in clinical trials. Pragmatic and Observational Research, Volume 8, 175–181. https://doi.org/10.2147/por.s144157

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free