Declarative versus imperative process modeling languages: The issue of maintainability

37Citations
Citations of this article
116Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The rise of interest in declarative languages for process modeling both justifies and demands empirical investigations into their presumed advantages over more traditional, imperative alternatives. Our concern in this paper is with the ease of maintaining business process models, for example due to changing performance or conformance demands. We aim to contribute to a rigorous, theoretical discussion of this topic by drawing a link to well-established research on maintainability of information artifacts. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fahland, D., Mendling, J., Reijers, H. A., Weber, B., Weidlich, M., & Zugal, S. (2010). Declarative versus imperative process modeling languages: The issue of maintainability. In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (Vol. 43 LNBIP, pp. 477–488). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12186-9_45

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free