Dynamical network size estimation from local observations

8Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Here we present a method to estimate the total number of nodes of a network using locally observed response dynamics. The algorithm has the following advantages: (a) it is data-driven. Therefore it does not require any prior knowledge about the model; (b) it does not need to collect measurements from multiple stimulus; and (c) it is distributed as it uses local information only, without any prior information about the global network. Even if only a single node is measured, the exact network size can be correctly estimated using a single trajectory. The proposed algorithm has been applied to both linear and nonlinear networks in simulation, illustrating the applicability to real-world physical networks.

References Powered by Scopus

Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks

34517Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena

2644Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Inferring genetic networks and identifying compound mode of action via expression profiling

966Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Revealing system dimension from single-variable time series

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Inferring the size of a collective of self-propelled Vicsek particles from the random motion of a single unit

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The detection matrix as a model-agnostic tool to estimate the number of degrees of freedom in mechanical systems and engineering structures

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tang, X., Huo, W., Yuan, Y., Li, X., Shi, L., Ding, H., & Kurths, J. (2020). Dynamical network size estimation from local observations. New Journal of Physics, 22(9). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/abaf2f

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

80%

Researcher 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 1

33%

Neuroscience 1

33%

Engineering 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free