A comparison of mine seismic discriminators based on features of source parameters to waveform characteristics

46Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To find efficient methods for classifying mine seismic events, two features extraction approaches were proposed. Features of source parameters including the seismic moment, the seismic energy, the energy ratio of S- to P-wave, the static stress drop, time of occurrence, and the number of triggers were selected, counted, and analyzed in approach I. Waveform characteristics consisting of two slope values and the coordinates of the first peak and the maximum peak were extracted as the discriminating parameters in approach II. The discriminating performance of the two approaches was compared and discussed by applying the Bayes discriminant analysis to the characteristic parameters extracted. Classification results show that 83.5% of the original grouped cases are correctly classified by approach I, and 97.1% of original grouped cases are correctly classified by approach II. The advantages and limitations pertaining to each classifier were discussed by plotting the event magnitude versus sample number. Comparative analysis shows that the proposed method of approach II not only has a low misjudgment rate but also displays relative constancy when the testing samples fluctuate with seismic magnitude and energy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ma, J., Zhao, G., Dong, L., Chen, G., & Zhang, C. (2015). A comparison of mine seismic discriminators based on features of source parameters to waveform characteristics. Shock and Vibration, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/919143

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free