Meta-analysis suggests the microbiome responds to Evolve and Resequence experiments in Drosophila melanogaster

12Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Experimental evolution has a long history of uncovering fundamental insights into evolutionary processes, but has largely neglected one underappreciated component--the microbiome. As eukaryotic hosts evolve, the microbiome may also respond to selection. However, the microbial contribution to host evolution remains poorly understood. Here, we re-analyzed genomic data to characterize the metagenomes from ten Evolve and Resequence (E&R) experiments in Drosophila melanogaster to determine how the microbiome changed in response to host selection. Results: Bacterial diversity was significantly different in 5/10 studies, primarily in traits associated with metabolism or immunity. Duration of selection did not significantly influence bacterial diversity, highlighting the importance of associations with specific host traits. Conclusions: Our genomic re-analysis suggests the microbiome often responds to host selection; thus, the microbiome may contribute to the response of Drosophila in E&R experiments. We outline important considerations for incorporating the microbiome into E&R experiments. The E&R approach may provide critical insights into host-microbiome interactions and fundamental insight into the genomic basis of adaptation.

References Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

4468Citations
5911Readers

This article is free to access.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

164Citations
315Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Henry, L. P., & Ayroles, J. F. (2021). Meta-analysis suggests the microbiome responds to Evolve and Resequence experiments in Drosophila melanogaster. BMC Microbiology, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02168-4

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

60%

Researcher 4

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5

38%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

31%

Immunology and Microbiology 2

15%

Engineering 2

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0