Sutureless scleral fixated IOL: The “Catcher Pole” technique

2Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To describe a new surgical technique for sutureless intrascleral intraocular lens (IOL) fixation with an adapted retinal scraper used as an instrument “the Catcher Pole” to retrieve the IOL haptic through a scleral tunnel. Setting: Public Eye Hospital, Roma, Italy. Design: Retrospective case series. Methods: Twenty-one eyes from 19 patients who underwent sutureless intrascleral IOL fixation were studied. A standard three-piece posterior chamber IOL (PCIOL) was implanted in aphakia or rescued and fixated in cases of dislocated PCIOL. A 23 to 25 G retinal loop scraper (the “Catcher Pole“) was inserted through a 1.5 mm long tunneled sclerotomy performed on the horizontal meridian, to capture, hold and externalize the tip of the haptic of the IOL. A flange created with an handheld cautery on the externalized haptic tip prevents IOL slippage. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal pachymetry (CCP), IOL tilt and complications were assessed. Results: In twenty-one eyes of 19 patients, the mean preoperative BCVA was 0.61 logMAR units ±0.05 SD, and the mean postoperative BCVA improved significantly to 0.18 logMAR units at three months ±0.05 SD (P=0.002). The mean preoperative CCP was 610 µ ±17 SD and the mean postoperative CCP 623 µ ±16 SD, (P=0.73). In the subgroup that underwent IOL tilt evaluation, mean IOL tilt was 3.19±2.01. The postoperative complications included iris capture of the IOL in one eye (4,7%) and transient ocular hypertension in two eyes (9,4%). Conclusions: The “Catcher Pole” sutureless intrascleral IOL fixation technique is easy to perform with reduced anterior chamber manipulations and achieves both anatomical and optical stability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tamburrelli, C., & Tamburrelli, A. C. (2021). Sutureless scleral fixated IOL: The “Catcher Pole” technique. Clinical Ophthalmology, 15, 121–128. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S288769

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free