The impact of integration of computer-aided detection and human observers

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We evaluated the impact of integration of CAD (Computer-Aided Detection) system and human observers in digital mammography. We com-pared the diagnostic efficacy of non-informed observers and informed observers regarding the CAD system's ability (average FP (false positive) per four images and sensitivity of microcalcifications and mass) to detect cancer. With the informed-group, we previously informed them of the accuracy of CAD. In each group, observers recorded the diagnosis before utilizing the CAD system and after utilizing the CAD system according to BI-RADs category and to six additional categories associated with diagnostic confidence, Regarding diagnostic accuracy, with the informed group, sensitivity and NPV were improved without an increase in FP. On the other hand, the diagnostic accuracy of human observers was influenced by prior notification of CAD's accuracy and by CAD's performance in cancer detection itself. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Uchiyama, N., Moriyama, N., Yamada, T., & Ohuchi, N. (2006). The impact of integration of computer-aided detection and human observers. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4046 LNCS, pp. 105–110). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11783237_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free