Discussion: Targeting is making trade-offs

6Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The previous articles presented different aspects of targeting: the implicit political implications, the trade-offs in giving power to different stakeholders to decide and to implement targeting, perceptions of frontline workers in implementing a program, and a technical article about selecting a scale for targeting, which we review in greater detail. It is well recognized that targeting results in a trade-off between not serving those who should be served and including those who should not be served. Less well recognized are the trade-offs that are the consequences of deciding between using indicators of risk vs. using indicators that predict benefit. © 2005 American Society for Nutritional Sciences.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Habicht, J. P., & Frongillo, E. A. (2005). Discussion: Targeting is making trade-offs. In Journal of Nutrition (Vol. 135, pp. 894–897). American Institute of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/135.4.894

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free