The previous articles presented different aspects of targeting: the implicit political implications, the trade-offs in giving power to different stakeholders to decide and to implement targeting, perceptions of frontline workers in implementing a program, and a technical article about selecting a scale for targeting, which we review in greater detail. It is well recognized that targeting results in a trade-off between not serving those who should be served and including those who should not be served. Less well recognized are the trade-offs that are the consequences of deciding between using indicators of risk vs. using indicators that predict benefit. © 2005 American Society for Nutritional Sciences.
CITATION STYLE
Habicht, J. P., & Frongillo, E. A. (2005). Discussion: Targeting is making trade-offs. In Journal of Nutrition (Vol. 135, pp. 894–897). American Institute of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/135.4.894
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.