Linguistic Criteria for Judging Composition and Division Fallacies

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation fallacies are defined as violations of rules for critical discussion that further the resolution of differences of opinion on the merits. Viewed within this perspective, fallacies are wrong discussion moves. Such moves can occur in every stage of the resolution process and they can be made by both parties. Among the wrong moves that may occur in the argumentation stage are the fallacies of composition and division.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2015). Linguistic Criteria for Judging Composition and Division Fallacies. In Argumentation Library (Vol. 27, pp. 595–609). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_31

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free