Some reflections on the problem of advance directives, personhood, and personal identity

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper, I consider objections to advance directives based on the claim that there is a discontinuity of interests, and of personal identity, between the time a person executes an advance directive and the time when the patient has become severely demented. Focusing narrowly on refusals of lifesustaining treatment for severely demented patients, I argue that acceptance of the psychological view of personal identity does not entail that treatment refusals should be overridden. Although severely demented patients are morally considerable beings, and must be kept comfortable whilst alive, they no longer have an interest in receiving life-sustaining treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kuhse, H. (2017). Some reflections on the problem of advance directives, personhood, and personal identity. In Medical Law and Ethics (pp. 433–450). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2572-9_23

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free