That makes sense to me: Openness to change and sensemaking in idea screening

11Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study examines how a person's sense of identity (expressed in terms of openness to change vs. conservation) influences the way in which they screen early ideas for innovation projects. To study this, we recruited 20 experts from a leading IT-consultancy firm to individually evaluate and comment on 12 R&D project ideas. This data was then analysed by using a configurational approach (fsQCA) to understand how different experts combine various evaluation dimensions together to make sense of and decide on the goodness of an idea. The findings show that experts who are open to change view ideas as opportunities and approach idea screening as a generative process, while conservative experts are more reserved in their idea screening activities.

References Powered by Scopus

Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries

10270Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Organizing and the process of sensemaking

4702Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research

3562Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Assessing travel satisfaction in public transport: A configurational approach

68Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How experts screen ideas: The complex interplay of intuition, analysis and sensemaking

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Idea evaluation as a design process: Understanding how experts develop ideas and manage fixations

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sukhov, A., Sihvonen, A., Olsson, L. E., & Magnusson, P. R. (2018). That makes sense to me: Openness to change and sensemaking in idea screening. International Journal of Innovation Management, 22(8). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919618400091

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

58%

Researcher 5

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 10

50%

Social Sciences 4

20%

Engineering 4

20%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 47

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0