A Comparison of Grid-based and Continuous Space Pedestrian Modelling Software: Analysis of Two UK Train Stations

  • Castle C
  • Waterson N
  • Pellissier E
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The present paper outlines different approaches to pedestrian model- ling, classifying them according to their movement and collision avoidance algo- rithms. An interesting question, not yet fully explored, is whether the simulation output is markedly different between the two main agent-based approaches. The paper explores this question by considering the operational performance of two rail stations in the UK. A software tool with a grid-based approach to pedestrian movement (STEPS 4.0), and a tool with a continuous approach (Legion Studio 2006) have been used to evaluate the gate-line clearance and platform circulation of passengers with respect to proposed station upgrades and future passenger de- mand. The paper concludes by summarizing the advantages of each approach, in the light of the findings from these studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Castle, C. J. E., Waterson, N. P., Pellissier, E., & Le Bail, S. (2011). A Comparison of Grid-based and Continuous Space Pedestrian Modelling Software: Analysis of Two UK Train Stations. In Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics (pp. 433–446). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9725-8_39

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free