Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory

21Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Listeners use lipread information to adjust the phonetic boundary between two speech categories (phonetic recalibration, Bertelson et al. 2003). Here, we examined phonetic recalibration while listeners were engaged in a visuospatial or verbal memory working memory task under different memory load conditions. Phonetic recalibration was\-like selective speech adaptation\- not affected by a concurrent verbal or visuospatial memory task. This result indicates that phonetic recalibration is a low-level process not critically depending on processes used in verbal- or visuospatial working memory. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.

References Powered by Scopus

Working memory

8910Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hearing lips and seeing voices

4627Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Visual Contribution to Speech Intelligibility in Noise

2149Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Brain activation during audiovisual exposure anticipates future perception of ambiguous speech

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Processing load impairs coordinate integration for the localization of touch

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Lexical representations are malleable for about one second: Evidence for the non-automaticity of perceptual recalibration

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baart, M., & Vroomen, J. (2010). Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory. Experimental Brain Research, 203(3), 575–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2264-9

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 26

70%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

16%

Researcher 4

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 15

52%

Linguistics 9

31%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

10%

Computer Science 2

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free