Comparison of regional and global GRACE gravity field models at high latitudes

4Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this study we address the question of whether regional gravity field modeling techniques of GRACE data can offer improved resolution over traditional global spherical harmonic solutions. Earlier studies into large, equatorial river basins such as the Amazon, Zambezi and others showed no obvious distinction between regional and global techniques, but this may have been limited by the fact that these equatorial regions are at the latitudes where GRACE errors are known to be largest (due to the sparse groundtrack coverage). This study will focus on regions of higher latitude, specifically Greenland and Antarctica, where the density of GRACE measurements is much higher. The regional modeling technique employed made use of spherical radial basis functions (SRBF), complete with an optimal filtering algorithm. Comparisons of these regional solutions were made to a range of other publicly available global spherical harmonic solutions, and validated using ICESat laser altimetry. The timeframe considered was a 3 year period spanning from October 2003 to September 2006. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gunter, B. C., Wittwer, T., Stolk, W., Klees, R., & Ditmar, P. (2012). Comparison of regional and global GRACE gravity field models at high latitudes. In International Association of Geodesy Symposia (Vol. 136, pp. 171–177). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20338-1_21

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free